Subscribe to IFRL

Contact the Media

GoodSearch cause banner

Option Line - 24 hour Pregnancy Hotline

Illinois Federation

For Right to Life

Daily News

A Tory councilor in Northumbria has resigned for suggesting that euthanasia is a solution to the cost of caring for disabled children. Councilor Hugh Jackson, ward councilor for Monkseaton North, had been suspended by his party after he remarked at a council meeting that euthanasia ought to be legalized to reduce the number of children in the care of public authorities.

The IFRL is the largest grassroots pro-life organization in Illinois. A non-profit organization, that serves as the state coordinating body for local pro-life chapters representing thousands of Illinois citizens working to restore respect for all human life in our society. The IFRL is composed of people of different political persuasions, various faiths and diverse economic, social and ethnic backgrounds. Since 1973 the Illinois Federation for Right to Life has been working to end abortion and restore legal protection to those members of the human family who are threatened by abortion, infanticide and euthanasia. Diverse though we are, we hold one common belief - that every human being has an inalienable right to life that is precious and must be protected. IFRL is dedicated to restoring the right to life to the unborn, and protection for the disabled and the elderly.   Click here to learn more about the IFRL.

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Euthanasia for Children in Government Care "Just a Joke" says Tory Councilor

Head of Euthanasia Prevention Coalition - International says comment was indicative of new public trend to disabled and vulnerable

Jackson quickly retracted and apologized for his comments, saying, "It was misplaced humor, one of those things I wish I had not said. As soon as I said it I wished I hadn't, it should never have been said." On Monday, the council was told he was stepping down.


But Alex Schadenberg, Secretariat chair for the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition - International, told that the comments, whether meant as a joke or not, are indicative of the new public attitude towards the disabled and vulnerable in this country.


"Thankfully, other councilors and most of the public have responded to the remarks with outrage," Schadenberg said. But he points out that the suggestion is a serious one, given the acceptance in other countries of euthanasia for disabled children. "Considering the acceptance of the Groningen Protocol in the Netherlands and the fact that Belgium legislators are considering extending euthanasia to newborns in their country, sadly Jackson's comments aren't far from reality."


The incident is not isolated. Last week the Telegraph reported that the Rev. Maxwell Craig, a Chaplain to the Queen in the Church of Scotland, suggested that too much money was spent in Britain on old people who are "clinging to life". Rev. Craig said that while he was not advocating withdrawing care from the elderly, he believed that the well-being and health of the next generation was more important than "squeezing out another few years".


"Is our nation, acting wisely to plough so much of our NHS and social work funding into the care of the elderly at the risk of giving less focus to the needs of the young?" Rev. Craig said.


Schadenberg commented: "Once again, the cost of caring for the most vulnerable people in society, whether they be people with disabilities, children in care, some of whom have disabilities, or the frail elderly, is being questioned within the context of their cost to society".


Schadenberg says that with the west's increasingly elderly population, a function of our current anti-child demographic trends, there is a "growing negative trend toward vulnerable persons in society that is fuelling a push to legalize euthanasia".


While euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is being touted as a "freedom of choice" issue, Schadenberg warns that it will result in the ending of many lives that are already being deemed to be too costly for care. "Remember, euthanasia is not about personal autonomy, it is about giving the right to another person (usually physicians) to kill a person for reasons that are defined by the government."


Contact: Hilary White


Source URL: