US Scientist Claims to Have Implanted 11
Cloned Embryos
A US reproductive scientist claims to have cloned 14 human embryos and
transferred 11 of them into 4 women. Although Dr. Panayiotis Zavos told
media last week that the experiment had failed to establish a
successful pregnancy, he intends to continue his work to create cloned
human embryos for full-term gestation. Zavos' claim was backed up by a
documentary filmmaker who said he recorded the procedures.
"There is absolutely no doubt about it, and I may not be the one that
does it, but the cloned child is coming. There is absolutely no way
that it will not happen," Dr. Zavos said.
"If we intensify our efforts, we can have a cloned baby within a year
or two," he said. In 2004, Dr. Zavos claimed to have transferred a
cloned human embryo into a woman's womb, but did not produce evidence
at the time to back up the claim.
A segment of the film depicting the recent procedures made available to
the press shows Dr. Zavos, dressed in surgical scrubs and sitting at a
microscope, interspersed with photos of what appear to be cells. The
footage featured in a documentary aired Wednesday on the Discovery
Channel in Britain.
"We managed to write chapter one," Zavos said. "Chapter two, we will
have a child a parent can take home and raise as a cloned child."
Agence France Presse reported that the experiment was carried out in a
secret location in the Middle East to avoid legislation in the US that
bans "human cloning," that is, "reproductive cloning."
Ethicists and scientists were quick to condemn Zavos' claim,
maintaining that cloned human embryos cannot be created "safely." The
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) issued a statement
calling attempts at "human cloning" unethical. The ASRM, however, in
quoting a previous decision, employed the shorthand expression "human
cloning" to mean only the creation of cloned embryos for purposes of
reproduction, not the creation of human clones as such.
"As long as the safety of reproductive SCNT (somatic cell nuclear
transfer) is uncertain, ethical issues have been insufficiently
explored, and infertile couples have alternatives for conception, the
use of reproductive SCNT by medical professionals does not meet
standards of ethical acceptability."
"Any attempt to create a cloned human embryo for gestation and birth is
ethically, scientifically, and clinically unacceptable."
Bishop Patrick O'Donoghue of the English Catholic diocese of Lancaster
was more comprehensive in his condemnation. He said in a statement
released on Friday that if Dr. Zavos' claims are true, his "actions are
deeply repugnant for the future of humanity."
Bishop O'Donohue said, "Cloning entails manipulating human life in ever
more invasive ways, and this will lead to 'making embryos to order,' as
well as other more and more serious abuses."
But Zavos said, "We're not going to be judged by the politicians or
clergymen, but rather by the fertility or infertility patients that
want a child of their own."
"Those clones are going to vote for those politicians some day. And
they will get to love them."
Although the US has yet to enact federal legislation, the scientific
community in the western world is largely united in its condemnation of
cloning for "reproductive" purposes, maintaining that it is only the
implantation of a cloned embryo, with the intention of bringing the
child to term, that is "unethical."
This consensus has established the concept, widely promoted in the
media, that while "reproductive cloning" is dangerous and must be
prohibited, "therapeutic" or experimental cloning in which the human
embryos are destroyed before viability, is not only acceptable but
necessary for the advancement of medical research. It has given rise in
many western countries to "clone-and-kill" legislation that bans
"reproductive cloning," while allowing the creation of clones for
experimentation, who must then, by law, be killed within a certain
period after fertilization.
Bishop O'Donohue addressed what some ethicists have called this
"fallacious dichotomy" in his statement, saying, "Those who support
destructive embryo research while criticizing Zavos are laying
themselves open to a charge of hypocrisy."
"Embryo research," the bishop continued, "which entails deliberately
killing human embryos should never be allowed, and experience shows
that once this key ethical principle is breached, it leads in turn to
relentless demand for more and more embryos to be used in ever more
debasing ways."
But some bioethicists are beginning to move away from their previous
absolute position against cloning for reproduction to a more pragmatic
position. An article in the Independent last week said that the "ethics
of human cloning centre on whether the technique is medically safe" for
the mother and the child. Therefore, birth defects, growth
abnormalities and possible unforeseen future health problems, as well
as the large number of ova required in cloning experiments, are now
considered among the very few ethical obstacles to bringing cloned
human children to term.
Steve Connor wrote in the Independent on April 22, "This is the
principal reason why most medical ethicists support the legal ban on
human reproductive cloning in Britain. However, some also take the view
that this is the only reason, and that human cloning would be ethical
if the medical dangers could be shown to be on a par with the risks of
a natural pregnancy and birth."
Zavos is also reportedly engaged in experiments in creating
human/animal hybrid clones using de-nucleated cow ova and genetic
material from the blood cells of a deceased 10-year-old girl. Zavos
claimed that this research was meant to help him understand the cloning
process but that these embryos were not intended for implantation.
Britain recently passed legislation specifically allowing the creation
of human/cow embryos for this type of research.
Although considered a "maverick" and working without the consent of the
greater part of the scientific community, Zavos is taken more seriously
than the other vocal and publicity-seeking aspirant to the leadership
of the "reproductive" cloning race - Italian Dr. Severino Antinori.
Zavos has authored or co-authored more than 400 peer-review
publications and serves as a Member of the International Advisory
Committee of the Middle East Fertility Society, and is a past Board
Member of the China Academy of Science.
Contact: Hilary White
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish
Date: April 27, 2009
Link
to this article.
Send
this article to a friend.
The IFRL is the largest grassroots pro-life organization in
Illinois. A non-profit organization, that serves as the state
coordinating body for local pro-life chapters representing thousands of
Illinois citizens working to restore respect for all human life in our
society. The IFRL is composed of people of different political
persuasions, various faiths and diverse economic, social and ethnic
backgrounds. Since 1973 the Illinois Federation for Right to Life has
been working to end abortion and restore legal protection to those members of the
human family who are threatened by abortion, infanticide and euthanasia. Diverse though we are, we hold one common belief - that
every human being has an inalienable right to life that is precious and must be protected. IFRL is
dedicated to restoring the right to life to the unborn, and protection
for the disabled and the elderly. Click here to learn more about the IFRL.
|