|
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) received $50 million from
the United States government this year, despite its involvement in
China, where the government's population program, according to the U.S.
State Department, includes a "coercive birth limitation policy" that in
some cases results "in forced abortion or forced sterilization."
The UNFPA says its programs in China are voluntary and respect human
rights.
Funding for the group was included in an omnibus appropriations bill
that Congress passed in March, which represents a reversal from the
Bush Administration's refusal to fund UNFPA.
During a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, UNFPA discussed
“the status of family planning in the developing world and its impact
on population dynamics and inequality.” Geeta Sen, an adjunct professor
of global health and population at the Harvard School of Public Health,
described UNFPA’s mission.
“Like our need for food and air and water, sex and reproduction are a
hearty perennial of human existence,” Sen said. “We are always going to
be doing those things and we need be able to do them safely. We need to
make sure poor people have the same rights in this area as rich people
do. We need to make sure that young people have the same rights and
abilities in sex and reproduction as older people do.”
The fund’s Web site repeats the phrase: “No woman should die giving
life.”
But critics of UNFPA say that phrase is a euphemism for population
control. Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute,
says UNFPA is pro-abortion.
The Population Research Institute describes its mission as exposing the
“myth of overpopulation” as well as human rights abuses committed in
population control programs.
“Reproductive health is a misleading phrase,” Mosher told CNSNews.com.
“Their measurement of reproductive health is . . . how many, what
percentage, of women in a population of reproductive age are (using
contraception) or have been sterilized.”
“(T)his is the U.N. Population Fund, this is not the U.N. Maternal
Health Fund, or the U.N. Natural Family Planning (Fund)” he said. “This
is a population-control group.”
Mosher said UNFPA’s assertion that “no woman should die giving life”
can be better met by offering prenatal care, attending to the mother at
the time of birth, and providing a means to get to a clinic in the case
of complications.
“You can reduce maternal mortality down to very low levels, levels that
we see in Germany, Sweden and the United States, but that’s not the
solution offered by the U.N. Population Fund,” said Mosher, who first
traveled to China in 1979 to interview women there about China’s “One
Child” forced abortion and sterilization program.
“(The fund) is going to ensure that no women die in child birth by
ensuring that no women get pregnant,” he added. “Well, that’s like
saying if you prevent people from driving cars, they won’t die in
traffic accidents. It’s true, but who would ever advocate that?”
In 1983, the U.N. agency gave its first World Population Award to Qian
Xinzhong, the minister of China’s State Family Planning Commission, who
was charged with overseeing that country’s “one-child policy.” At a
family planning conference the prior year, Xinzhong made it known that
his goal was 100 percent sterilization by 1985 for couples that already
had two children.
A 2001 report Mosher authored for the Population Research Institute
details population-control efforts in China, where the UNFPA allegedly
supports the one-child policy and even funds programs sterilizing women
and aborting additional children.
Mosher said little has changed since Xinzhong’s tenure: “It’s still
just as brutal as it was in the beginning, 30 years ago,” he said.
“Women are arrested and aborted there, sometimes in the (last months)
of pregnancy,” he said.
The PRI report includes interviews that were submitted as congressional
testimony in 2001 showing widespread human rights abuses in Sihui
County. That county is said to be representative of the rest of the
country. Although UNFPA denies any coercion takes place, Mosher says
the UNFPA works with China’s family planning authorities.
The subjects in the 2001 testimony include:
-- A woman who was forcibly sterilized after having a second child, but
then had a third child after the operation failed. She was sterilized a
second time and has not become pregnant again.
Asked by the interviewers what would happen if she tried to evade
family planning workers who came to sterilize her, she said, “That
wouldn’t work. They would tear down my house.”
Pointing at the ceiling, she said, “They would wreck it.”
-- A woman who was pregnant with her second child and refused to abort
it. She went into hiding until three family members were arrested, then
was forced to hide with her in-laws, six of whom were then arrested and
three of whose homes were destroyed by authorities armed with
jackhammers.
“Look at this,” her father said. “All of the doors and windows
destroyed . . . It took forty bags of cement to repair the holes.”
Local officials also told the PRI’s investigative team, according to
the report, that “there is no distinction between UNFPA’s program in
Sihui and the Chinese family planning program (there).”
UNFPA, however, maintains that no coercion is happening in Sihui
County, and it told CNSNews.com that their programs are entirely
voluntary.
“(W)e have been found by the U.S government, by the Secretary of State,
Secretary Clinton, to not be in violation of any U.S. laws,” Sarah
Craven, chief of UNFPA’s Washington, D.C., office, said. “Our program
in China promotes an approach based in voluntarism and human rights.”
The Kemp-Kasten amendment, regularly found in appropriations bills
including the March omnibus appropriations bill, forbids federal money
from going to any organization that “supports or participates in the
management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary
sterilization.”
The Obama administration and Secretary Clinton have found that UNFPA
does not violate Kemp-Kasten, and House Democrats also authored
language guaranteeing funds to UNFPA.
But Mosher finds the certification incomprehensible.
“I have talked to literally hundreds of people on the ground in China
in the last few weeks, and the program is clearly coercive,” he said.
“(The fund) is not making a difference in the direction of voluntarism,
which it claims to be, and there’s no way that Secretary Clinton
couldn’t know that.”
Indeed, the State Department’s 2008 Human Rights Report on China,
published on February 25 of this year, describes China's population
control program as sharply coercive.
"The government continued its coercive birth limitation policy, in some
cases resulting in forced abortion or forced sterilization," said the
State Department.
"Those who violated the child limit policy by having an unapproved
child or helping another do so faced disciplinary measures such as
social compensation fees, job loss or demotion, loss of promotion
opportunity, expulsion from the party (membership in which was an
unofficial requirement for certain jobs), and other administrative
punishments, including in some cases the destruction of private
property," said the State Department. "In the case of families that
already had two children, one parent was often pressured to undergo
sterilization. The penalties sometimes left women with little practical
choice but to undergo abortion or sterilization."
One Chinese woman's case, according to the State Deparment, ended with
Chinese officials killing a child who had just been born.
"In March family-planning officials in Henan Province reportedly
forcibly detained a 23-year-old unmarried woman who was seven months
pregnant," said the State Department. "Officials reportedly tied her to
a bed, induced labor, and killed the newborn upon delivery."
According to its annual report, UNFPA spent more than 66 percent of its
2008 Asia budget on “reproductive health."
“(N)o one is saying that the UNFPA office staffer in Sihui County is
actually out there doing abortions, but does he know about them? Is he
complicit? Does he work with the family planning authorities?” Mosher
asked.
“Do they know what the quotas are, the targets? Do they know that women
are arrested and (undergo abortions) sometimes in the eighth and ninth
months of pregnancy? Of course they know. Are they funding the program?
Of course they are.”
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell made similar findings when he
sent a fact-finding mission to China in May 2002, saying, UNFPA’s
“support of, and involvement in, China's population-planning activities
allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program
of coercive abortion.”
The UNFPA's Craven said: “(W)e are absolutely delighted that the United
States has come back as a funding partner and joined the 180 other
countries around the world that support (us).”
The $50 million from the omnibus bill makes the United States one of
the top UNFPA donors, along with the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden.
Contact: Christopher Neefus
Source: CNSNews.com
Publish
Date: July 2, 2009
Link
to this article.
Send
this article to a friend.
 
The IFRL is the largest grassroots pro-life organization in
Illinois. A non-profit organization, that serves as the state
coordinating body for local pro-life chapters representing thousands of
Illinois citizens working to restore respect for all human life in our
society. The IFRL is composed of people of different political
persuasions, various faiths and diverse economic, social and ethnic
backgrounds. Since 1973 the Illinois Federation for Right to Life has
been working to end abortion and restore legal protection to those members of the
human family who are threatened by abortion, infanticide and euthanasia. Diverse though we are, we hold one common belief - that
every human being has an inalienable right to life that is precious and must be protected. IFRL is
dedicated to restoring the right to life to the unborn, and protection
for the disabled and the elderly. Click here to learn more about the IFRL.
|
