First Abortion: 35% Risk Low Birth-Weight
and Premature Babies, Second Abortion 93%
A new Canadian study has shown that abortion increases the risk of
future premature pregnancies and low birth-weight babies; however, the
author has refused to say that abortion should be avoided, instead
calling for improved abortion techniques.
Published in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, the Canadian researchers found that women who had
undergone a first or second trimester of pregnancy, when most are
conducted, increased the risk of low birth-weight babies and premature
babies 35 and 36 per cent respectively.
Those women who had undergone more than one abortion had a 72 per cent
increased risk for low birth weight and 93 per cent risk of prematurity.
The figures come from an analysis of 37 studies around the world,
carried out between 1965 and 2001, to discover reasons why babies are
born underweight and premature.
Far from recommending that women not have abortions, the lead author of
the study, Dr. Prakesh Shah of the department of paediatrics at Mount
Sinai hospital in Toronto, said that the solution is to improve
However, "when a woman comes for induced termination of pregnancy, she
should be counselled about that risk. At least she will be able to make
an informed choice," he said.
Shah told media that he was fearful that "anti-abortion groups" would
seize upon the study as proof of the damage abortion does to women.
"I think it should not be used as a way of saying, this is bad and we
should not be doing this kind of thing. There is an association which
we should be aware of, and we should let mothers be aware. I don't want
unintended pregnancies to increase."
The Guardian newspaper reports that the Royal College of Obstetricians
and Gynaecologists concurs. The RCOG spoke of the "importance of
support for women's choices." "Abortion remains an essential part of
women's healthcare services," they said.
Professor Philip Steer, editor in chief of BJOG, was also anxious that
the study not be used by the pro-life movement. "The most important
message is not that this should be used in any way to prevent women
having a termination of pregnancy.
"The effect has to be balanced against the serious effects of forcing
women to continue with unwanted pregnancies," he said. "Any medical
procedure is likely to have side-effects."
Anthony Ozimic of Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC)
commented, however, that the evidence speaks for itself. "The more
evidence which emerges about the harm abortion causes, the more the
supporters of abortion insist that abortion not be restricted. We will
be exposing the contradictions in their responses to the study's
Contact: Hilary White
to this article.
this article to a friend.
The IFRL is the largest grassroots pro-life organization in
Illinois. A non-profit organization, that serves as the state
coordinating body for local pro-life chapters representing thousands of
Illinois citizens working to restore respect for all human life in our
society. The IFRL is composed of people of different political
persuasions, various faiths and diverse economic, social and ethnic
backgrounds. Since 1973 the Illinois Federation for Right to Life has
been working to end abortion and restore legal protection to those members of the
human family who are threatened by abortion, infanticide and euthanasia. Diverse though we are, we hold one common belief - that
every human being has an inalienable right to life that is precious and must be protected. IFRL is
dedicated to restoring the right to life to the unborn, and protection
for the disabled and the elderly. Click here to learn more about the IFRL.