Deadly Danger of Treating Patients as
Category Members Instead of Individuals
Many hospitals and nursing homes in the UK have adopted something
called the Liverpool Care Pathway, in which dying patients are
sedated–whether or not they need it to control unrelievable pain,
apparently–and then denied food and water until death.
Currently about 16.5 percent of deaths in the UK occur while
sedated–which is far more than the hospice experts I have talked with
have told me is necessary to actually alleviate suffering.
Indeed,
they tell me sedation is rarely necessary in hospice practice If
that
is true, and I intend to do some more research on this, the Pathway
misuses the legitimate treatment of palliative sedation, and mutates it
in some cases into a method of causing death, known as terminal
sedation. This means that sedation is sometimes administered, not
because the individual patient actually needs the procedure, but
because he or she has been reduced to a category member, and that’s how
members of the category are treated.
That’s a prescription for disaster. And now, a woman was almost
dehydrated to death after being put mistakenly on the Pathway.
From
the story:
AN 80-year-old grandmother who doctors identified as
terminally ill
and left to starve to death has recovered after her outraged daughter
intervened. Hazel Fenton, from East Sussex, is alive nine months after
medics ruled she had only days to live, withdrew her antibiotics and
denied her artificial feeding. The former school matron had been placed
on a controversial care plan intended to ease the last days of dying
patients.
Doctors say Fenton is an example of patients who
have been
condemned to death on the Liverpool care pathway plan. They argue that
while it is suitable for patients who do have only days to live, it is
being used more widely in the NHS, denying treatment to elderly
patients who are not dying.
Why are we surprised? The Pathway is a blunt intstrument, and the
uniqueness of each case is lost in the drugs sedating effects.
Even
though its authors believed they had created a nuanced protocol, that
is never how these things are actually applied in clinical
practice.
Eventually, such “pathways” threaten to transform medicine into a
paint-by-the numbers technocracy.
And look at what it took to save Hazel from dehydration:
Fenton was admitted to hospital suffering from
pneumonia. Although
Ball acknowledged that her mother was very ill she was astonished when
a junior doctor told her she was going to be placed on the plan to
“make her more comfortable” in her last days. Ball insisted that her
mother was not dying but her objections were ignored. A nurse even
approached her to say: “What do you want done with your mother’s body?”
On January 19, Fenton’s 80th birthday, Ball says her mother was feeling
better and chatting to her family, but it took another four days to
persuade doctors to give her artificial feeding.
This is a consequence of surrendering care approaches to
cost/benefit/best care bureaucratic panels. It becomes an excuse
to
merely write people off, particularly in a utilitarian environment
where “quality of life” may determine the way the patient’s life is
perceived by caregivers.
How many Hazel Fosters have died by dehydration who might have lived,
or who could have spent their last days–pain controlled but awake and
aware–surrounded by family? There is no way to know.
Contact: Wesley J. Smith
Source: Secondhand Smoke
Publish
Date: October 12, 2009
Link
to this article.
Send
this article to a friend.
The IFRL is the largest grassroots pro-life organization in
Illinois. A non-profit organization, that serves as the state
coordinating body for local pro-life chapters representing thousands of
Illinois citizens working to restore respect for all human life in our
society. The IFRL is composed of people of different political
persuasions, various faiths and diverse economic, social and ethnic
backgrounds. Since 1973 the Illinois Federation for Right to Life has
been working to end abortion and restore legal protection to those members of the
human family who are threatened by abortion, infanticide and euthanasia. Diverse though we are, we hold one common belief - that
every human being has an inalienable right to life that is precious and must be protected. IFRL is
dedicated to restoring the right to life to the unborn, and protection
for the disabled and the elderly. Click here to learn more about the IFRL.