Illinois
Considers
'Presumed
Consent' Organ Harvesting Bill
An Illinois senator is pushing legislation that would allow doctors to
harvest organs from citizens who have not explicitly given consent for
the procedure.
The Journal Star reported Monday that a hearing was scheduled this week
for Sen. Dale Risinger's bill that would establish a "presumed consent"
policy governing organ donation for individuals 18 and older.
"This is an important first step to getting a law in Illinois that
helps us have more organ donors," said Risinger, a Republican. Risinger
said he was open to public input suggesting revisions to the bill, and
that it was not "in its final form."
Under the proposed legislation, individuals who wish to avoid donating
their organs would have to explicitly opt-out of donating their organs
prior to becoming incapacitated. If passed, the law would be the first
of its kind in America.
Stephen Drake of the anti-euthanasia group Not Dead Yet pointed out the
grave implications of such a bill, given the flexibility of the
definition of brain death, which can vary from hospital to hospital.
Vital organs such as the heart become unusable after an extended period
of complete cessation of bodily functions. Therefore, "brain death" is
used as a parameter to determine when an individual is extremely
unlikely to recover, even as functions such as the heartbeat continue,
so that usable organs may be removed.
But the flexibility of that definition has raised considerable
controversy.
"Most people assume that since the state they live in considers them a
corpse if they're declared 'brain dead,' then the state also imposes
some sort of uniform standards regarding how that determination should
be made," wrote Drake.
"That's a comforting thought, but it's not the reality." Drake pointed
to a 2008 article in the medical journal Neurology that discovered
"wide disparities" in hospitals' determinations of brain death.
Drake also pointed to the well-known case of Zack Dunlap, who
"miraculously" became responsive after being diagnosed brain dead, but
minutes before his organs were to be harvested.
Prominent bioethics commentator Wesley Smith predicted that the
legislation would only serve to breed mistrust between an
already-strained doctor-patient relationship.
"Think about it: We already have bioethicists advocating for futile
care theory, that is the right to refuse wanted life sustaining
treatment based on quality of life judgmentalism, resource allocation,
or both," wrote Smith on his Secondhand Smoke blog.
"Add in the motive for taking organs to this volatile field – and wary
families will become even less trusting, and medical issues will become
even more likely to end up in court," he continued. "Square that if we
ever enact explicit health care rationing, or redefine death to include
a diagnosis of PVS – as many luminaries in the transplant field
advocate.
"If doctors ever start taking organs without explicit permission – even
if allowed by law – there will be hell to pay."
Contact: Kathleen Gilbert
Source:
LifeSiteNews.com
Publish
Date:
March 4, 2010
Link
to
this
article.
Send
this
article
to
a friend.
The IFRL is the largest grassroots pro-life organization in
Illinois. A non-profit organization, that serves as the state
coordinating body for local pro-life chapters representing thousands of
Illinois citizens working to restore respect for all human life in our
society. The IFRL is composed of people of different political
persuasions, various faiths and diverse economic, social and ethnic
backgrounds. Since 1973 the Illinois Federation for Right to Life has
been working to end abortion and restore legal protection to those members of the
human family who are threatened by abortion, infanticide and euthanasia. Diverse though we are, we hold one common belief - that
every human being has an inalienable right to life that is precious and must be protected. IFRL is
dedicated to restoring the right to life to the unborn, and protection
for the disabled and the elderly. Click here to learn more about the IFRL.