Organ Donor
Wishes Recorded Incorrectly for 800,000 Britons
As many as 800,000 people on the UK organ donor register may have had
their preferences about which organs they wished to donate recorded
incorrectly according to the BBC.
The foul-up concerns UK residents who gave details of which organs they
were willing to have removed after their death on the application to
renew their driver's license.
Stephen Banks, 27, from Redditch, Worcestershire, told the BBC he was
shocked to discover that upon his death, his eyes could be made
available for donation - against his wishes.
He said that while filling out the form to renew his driving license in
February he indicated he was happy to donate all his organs - apart
from his eyes. Subsequently he received a letter from the National
Health Service (NHS) Blood and Transplant Authority thanking him for
donating all of his organs including his eyes.
"I feel a bit embarrassed to call up and say, 'I want my eyes back,'"
Banks said.
Health Secretary Andy Burnham said errors in recording donors'
preferences began appearing over ten years ago.
"It would appear to relate to a technical error going back to 1999 and
this was how data was transferred between the DVLA (Driving and Vehicle
Licensing Authority) and the blood and transplant service. That has now
been corrected," he said.
A consequence of the data-handling errors is that the NHS Transplant
Authority has confirmed 21 cases in which organs may have been taken
from donors without their prior consent.
A spokeswoman for NHS Blood and Transplant told the Sunday Telegraph,
"We are aware of issues with the records with a small proportion of the
people who signed up to the NHS organ donor register. There are a small
number of cases, 21 over the past six years, where the person has died
and their preferences may not have been correctly recorded.
"We are taking it very seriously and are urgently investigating the
situation. Our priority is in ensuring that the families of those who
may have been affected are contacted."
Joyce Robins of the patient advocacy group Patient Concern commented,
"This government has got an absolutely dreadful record when it comes to
data, but it is horrific that such sensitive details were handled in
such a careless way."
The admission by the NHS of the mishandling of organ donors' data
exacerbates the lack of confidence Britons have in the organ transplant
system.
In 2008 the British government's considered a "presumed consent" scheme
for organ donations; but this was later put on the back burner. But
though the "presumed consent" plan was withdrawn, the recommendations
of the government task force that was assigned to review the question
of how to increase organ donations alarmed pro-life advocates, who
warned they could increase threats to the lives of vulnerable patients
who may have organs removed from their bodies before they are dead.
The task force said that a patient becomes a potential donor "when a
decision has been taken - in the best interests of the patient - that
further active treatment is no longer appropriate and should be
withdrawn."
"The terms ‘treatment’ and ‘best interests’ are the key phrases," said
John Smeaton, head of the Society for the Protection of Unborn
Children, at the time, "because they have become code words for passive
euthanasia by dehydration."
Contact: Thaddeus M.
Baklinski
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish
Date:
April 14, 2010
Link
to
this
article.
Send
this
article
to
a
friend.
The IFRL is the largest grassroots pro-life organization in
Illinois. A non-profit organization, that serves as the state
coordinating body for local pro-life chapters representing thousands of
Illinois citizens working to restore respect for all human life in our
society. The IFRL is composed of people of different political
persuasions, various faiths and diverse economic, social and ethnic
backgrounds. Since 1973 the Illinois Federation for Right to Life has
been working to end abortion and restore legal protection to those members of the
human family who are threatened by abortion, infanticide and euthanasia. Diverse though we are, we hold one common belief - that
every human being has an inalienable right to life that is precious and must be protected. IFRL is
dedicated to restoring the right to life to the unborn, and protection
for the disabled and the elderly. Click here to learn more about the IFRL.